updates

Backend/venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/nltk/misc/chomsky.py

@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+# Chomsky random text generator, version 1.1, Raymond Hettinger, 2005/09/13
+# https://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/440546
+
+"""
+CHOMSKY is an aid to writing linguistic papers in the style
+of the great master.  It is based on selected phrases taken
+from actual books and articles written by Noam Chomsky.
+Upon request, it assembles the phrases in the elegant
+stylistic patterns that Chomsky is noted for.
+To generate n sentences of linguistic wisdom, type
+
+    (CHOMSKY n)  -- for example
+    (CHOMSKY 5) generates half a screen of linguistic truth.
+"""
+
+leadins = """To characterize a linguistic level L,
+    On the other hand,
+    This suggests that
+    It appears that
+    Furthermore,
+    We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis:
+    To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K),
+    From C1, it follows that
+    For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in \
+application to be of any interest,
+    Analogously,
+    Clearly,
+    Note that
+    Of course,
+    Suppose, for instance, that
+    Thus
+    With this clarification,
+    Conversely,
+    We have already seen that
+    By combining adjunctions and certain deformations,
+    I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that
+    If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively \
+inaccessible to movement,
+    However, this assumption is not correct, since
+    Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in \
+(96) and (97), we see that
+    In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81),
+    So far,
+    Nevertheless,
+    For one thing,
+    Summarizing, then, we assume that
+    A consequence of the approach just outlined is that
+    Presumably,
+    On our assumptions,
+    It may be, then, that
+    It must be emphasized, once again, that
+    Let us continue to suppose that
+    Notice, incidentally, that """
+# List of LEADINs to buy time.
+
+subjects = """ the notion of level of grammaticalness
+    a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort
+    most of the methodological work in modern linguistics
+    a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds
+    the natural general principle that will subsume this case
+    an important property of these three types of EC
+    any associated supporting element
+    the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible \
+to ordinary extraction
+    the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition
+    the descriptive power of the base component
+    the earlier discussion of deviance
+    this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features
+    this selectionally introduced contextual feature
+    a descriptively adequate grammar
+    the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial
+    relational information
+    the systematic use of complex symbols
+    the theory of syntactic features developed earlier"""
+# List of SUBJECTs chosen for maximum professorial macho.
+
+verbs = """can be defined in such a way as to impose
+    delimits
+    suffices to account for
+    cannot be arbitrary in
+    is not subject to
+    does not readily tolerate
+    raises serious doubts about
+    is not quite equivalent to
+    does not affect the structure of
+    may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate
+    is not to be considered in determining
+    is to be regarded as
+    is unspecified with respect to
+    is, apparently, determined by
+    is necessary to impose an interpretation on
+    appears to correlate rather closely with
+    is rather different from"""
+# List of VERBs chosen for autorecursive obfuscation.
+
+objects = """ problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.
+    a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined \
+by the paired utterance test.
+    the traditional practice of grammarians.
+    the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual \
+gibberish (e.g. (98d)).
+    a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.
+    a descriptive fact.
+    a parasitic gap construction.
+    the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34).
+    the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.
+    the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.
+    irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.
+    nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.
+    a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.
+    an abstract underlying order.
+    an important distinction in language use.
+    the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance \
+scope of a complex symbol.
+    the strong generative capacity of the theory."""
+# List of OBJECTs selected for profound sententiousness.
+
+import random
+import textwrap
+from itertools import chain, islice
+
+
+def generate_chomsky(times=5, line_length=72):
+    parts = []
+    for part in (leadins, subjects, verbs, objects):
+        phraselist = list(map(str.strip, part.splitlines()))
+        random.shuffle(phraselist)
+        parts.append(phraselist)
+    output = chain.from_iterable(islice(zip(*parts), 0, times))
+    print(textwrap.fill(" ".join(output), line_length))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    generate_chomsky()